…this man.
Will acts of terrorism diminish considerably or end because of one man’s death? Will his death suffice to bring genuine and long-lasting peace? Was he really the perpetrator of terrorism? Or, was he really the sole perpetrator of terrorism?
If he really was a terrorist, why did some people hold him with high regard? Were ALL his followers or sympathizers automatically terrorists? If so, should they be get rid of, even if they were unarmed and not posing as an actual threat to society?
If he really was a terrorist, why attack him just recently? I thought that “the Agency” was the best in all the world, yet it took them more than a decade to eliminate the so-called threat? Was this the best of the best that “the Agency” could really offer?
If he really was a heinous threat to [inter]national security, why use the label of a historical figure who is looked upon as hero who defended his people’s territory? Wouldn’t using “Geronimo” offend the Native Americans? (It seems contrary to the idea of respect and brotherhood in a democracy which America really boasts of.)
Most of all, did a person named Osama bin Laden really exist? What if he’s just a made-up bogeyman intended for creating scare tactics? What if the man we saw in pictures and video footage was only an actor hired by some insidious organization to create a terrorist conspiracy and freak the crap out of the populace?
WHAT IF WE WERE ONLY DUPED?!!!
Perhaps that is why they were trying keep actual footage of Osama’s death under wraps????
All these questions are giving me a migraine.
Matulog na lang ‘ko gani. Good luck, godspeed, God bless na lang ‘da sa inyo ah.
No comments:
Post a Comment